Robert
Bradley contrasts the safety of pipelines – the safest way to move energy –
with the myths perpetuated by anti-growth opponents of energy development.
Our
associates from the Institute for Energy Research, who shared this guest post,
recently published in Forbes, with us.
Have
you heard? Transporting oil through pipelines is a threat to humanity! The many
accidents highlighted in the press speak for themselves.
Except
that pipeline accidents are rare enough to be big news—and many of those
accounts contain exaggerations. Too often, they imply that pipelines, really
the energy they carry, should be phased down and out.
Before (left) and after (right) photos of pipeline development |
Welcome
to the war on fossil fuels, where every mishap is portrayed as the Bad News
Bears. It is as if accident-free, effortless alternatives were at the ready.
Consider
the recent article from Michigan that Enbridge Line 5, piping crude oil through
the Great Lake State’s upper and lower peninsulas, has spilled 1.1 million
gallons of oil since 1968.
The
catch is, the majority of these incidents happened decades ago, the most
significant occurring in 1968, 1972, and 1990.
The
real news, in other words, is that technological advances have made pipelines
safer than ever. But that lead goes unmentioned. Or it is buried, which may be
how the author wishes fossil fuels to remain.
Then,
there’s this: an article in the Philadelphia Inquirerreports that “fearful”
parents of children attending schools near the soon-to-be-built Mariner 2
pipeline are demanding evacuation routes in case of pipeline leakage.
It
is barely mentioned that construction of this pipeline, which will move liquid
gas from Pittsburgh to the Marcus Hook refinery in Eastern Pennsylvania, will
be heavily regulated and subject to strict oversight. And, more importantly,
self-regulated since accidents can ruin the reputation and finances of any
company.
Have
there been accidents in the 150 years since oil pipelines have been in use? Of
course. And a spill or a crack, no matter the magnitude, is never good. But the
happy truth is that rapidly advancing technology in pipeline construction and
operation is improving safety.
Headlines
aside, what is the record of pipeline safety?
In
2016 the number of oil pipeline accidents fell 10 percent from the previous year.
Trend-wise, incidents that specifically affected the public and environment
ticked up about five years ago, but have since levelled off. That’s because any
spike in accidents spurs an immediate, industry-wide effort toward brining
numbers back down.
What’s
more, nearly 70 percent of pipeline accidents in 2016 only affected operator
facilities like pump stations and tank farms. And 60 percent of incidents
leaked only miniscule amount of liquid – five barrels or less.
So
where are the good-news headlines?
Also,
consider that America’s 500,000 miles of interstate pipeline are far safer than
any other method of moving crude and petroleum products.
This
is evident when comparing the number of pipeline accidents to oil
transportation by road and rail. The former, with 19.95 accidents per billion
ton-miles, is the least safe method, followed by the latter, with 2.08 miles
per billion ton miles. Oil pipelines, by comparison, have .058 mishaps per
billion ton-miles.
Similarly,
pipelines keep operators and the general public out of harm’s way. Between 2005
and 2009, for example, the average fatality rate for natural gas pipelines was
one per year. During the same time span, rail averaged nearly three, and road
transport more than 10.
The
statistics are so convincing that even those who oppose pipelines can’t
credibly deny their safety.
“Many
studies say that using a pipeline as a conduit is safer than rail travel and
truck travel,” noted New York’s Governor Andrew Cuomo — who has repeatedly
blocked pipeline projects in his state. “Realistically you have to move fuel,
so a pipeline is the safest way if it’s done right.”
The
most interesting part of Cuomo’s statement is the qualifier “if it’s done
right.” The governor likely knows, though his fellow skeptics are loath to
admit, that there are a multitude of measures in place to ensure that oil
travels securely through pipelines.
Pipeline
operators are constantly evaluating safety procedures and launching new
initiatives, including several that help prepare the public to spot and report
any possible defects.
Back
in 2014, the industry launched the Pipeline Safety Initiative — tasked with
revamping everything from inspection technology to emergency response
resources.
And
100 percent of pipelines are regularly monitored, both on the ground and
aerially.
No
wonder then that 99.999 percent of crude oil shipped via pipeline reaches its
destination safely.
Another
category of the untold (versus the bad news) is the benefits of pipelines for
America’s economy.
Consider
the Keystone XL and Dakota Access Pipelines, both long-delayed but now
green-lit by President Donald Trump. The Keystone will support 42,100 jobs and
generate $2 billion in earnings, while the Dakota Access has already created
12,000 and $3.5 billion worth of investment.
Currently,
workers are getting Dakota ready for action by June 1. And despite headlines to
the contrary, Dakota is completely safe. The steel that walls the pipe is 50
percent thicker than legally mandated, and the pipeline will be monitored
aerially on a weekly basis.
These
projects are consumer-driven and pay taxes, not politically-driven tax takers.
And that oil feeds refineries that fuel 253 million cars and trucks, 7,000
airplanes, and trains on 600 freight railroads traversing the United States.
Americans
should read any news of petroleum pipeline mishaps with caution. While any
spill or other accident is one too many, as anyone in the industry will tell
you, the trends are positive.
Pipelines
are not only the safest way to move oil, but they are now, thanks to technology
and rigorous industry standards, safer than ever. All across the country,
construction is underway on pipelines that will provide energy and jobs to
millions of Americans.
Now
that’s something worth reporting.
Source: http://naturalgasnow.org
No comments:
Post a Comment